27 May Your Partner Wants Out. You Can’t Afford to Buy Them Out. Now What?
It usually starts with a conversation that nobody saw coming. Your business partner walks into the office, closes the door, and says, “I’ve been thinking about this for a while. I want out.”
Maybe they’re burned out. Maybe there’s a health issue. Maybe they got a better offer from someone else. The reason doesn’t really matter. What matters is that your operating agreement says you have the right, or the obligation, to buy their interest. And the number on the page is one you can’t write a check for. Or worse, you have no written agreement at all.
This is the moment that separates business owners who planned for partner departures from those who didn’t. And the difference, measured in dollars and destroyed relationships, is enormous.
The Valuation Shock
Most business owners have a rough sense of what their company is worth. But rough isn’t good enough when you’re staring at a mandatory buyout. If your partner owns 40 percent of a company that an appraiser values at $12 million, you owe $4.8 million. If you don’t have $4.8 million in liquid capital, and most business owners don’t, you have a problem that’s growing by the day.
The valuation itself can become a fight. If your buy-sell agreement specifies a formula, the departing partner may argue the formula understates the real value. If the agreement calls for an appraisal, you’ll disagree about which appraiser to use, what standard of value to apply, and whether discounts for lack of marketability apply. Every one of those disputes costs time and legal fees, and during the dispute, the business is in limbo.
Why Most Buy-Sell Agreements Fail at This Moment
The most common failure in buy-sell agreements isn’t the price. It’s the payment terms. Many agreements say the remaining owner must buy the departing partner’s interest but don’t specify how or when. Or they specify a lump-sum payment that nobody can actually make. Or they include installment terms so unfavorable that the remaining owner is effectively working for the departed partner for years.
A well-drafted agreement should address the funding mechanism before the triggering event occurs. Life insurance can fund a death buyout. Disability buyout insurance can fund an incapacity departure. But a voluntary departure, the most common scenario, is rarely funded in advance. That means the agreement needs to specify reasonable installment terms, including the interest rate, the payment schedule, and what collateral secures the obligation.
The Hostage Problem
When the remaining owner can’t afford the buyout, the departing partner holds the stronger hand, and they know it. They can demand a premium above the appraised value. They can insist on terms that strip cash from the business. They can threaten to sell their interest to a third party, someone you’d never choose as a partner, unless you meet their price.
This a pattern that has destroyed decades-long friendships. The departing partner feels they’ve earned their share. The remaining partner feels trapped. Both are right, in a sense. The problem isn’t that either person is unreasonable. The problem is that the agreement didn’t contemplate this situation with enough specificity to prevent it from turning into a fight.
Creative Structures That Can Break the Logjam
When a buyout can’t be funded in a single payment, there are structures that can make it work. An earn-out tied to future business performance gives the departing partner upside without requiring the remaining owner to come up with cash today. A seller-financed installment note with a reasonable interest rate spreads the payment over five to ten years, turning the departing partner into a lender who is paid back over time. A structured redemption, where the company itself buys back and retires the departing partner’s interest rather than the remaining owner buying it personally, lets the business fund the exit with its own dollars instead of the surviving owner’s after-tax money. That single choice, entity buys versus individual buys, changes the tax result dramatically, and the right answer depends on whether the company is taxed as a C corporation, an S corporation, or a partnership. Each one runs on a different set of rules, so a redemption that saves a fortune in one structure can trigger an unexpected tax bill in another. This is exactly the kind of decision you want modeled before you sign, not after.
In some cases, bringing in a third-party investor, whether a junior partner, a private equity fund, or a strategic buyer for a minority interest, provides the cash needed to fund the buyout while keeping the remaining owner in control. None of these are simple. All of them require negotiation. But all of them are better than a deadlock that slowly kills the business.
The Conversation to Have Before You Need It
Every business with more than one owner should have a buy-sell agreement that answers three questions clearly. First, what triggers a buyout? Death, disability, voluntary departure, involuntary departure, retirement, what else? Second, how is the price determined? Fixed value, formula, appraisal, or some combination? Third, how is the price paid? Lump sum, installment, insurance-funded, company-funded, or individually funded?
If your current agreement doesn’t answer all three questions with specificity, it’s not protecting you. It’s giving you a false sense of security while the real risk sits quietly in a file cabinet, waiting for the day your partner closes the door and says, “We need to talk.”
Is Your Buy-Sell Agreement Ready for the Day Your Partner Wants Out?
For advisors: Have a client dealing with this? I do quick consult calls for advisors working through complex planning situations.
Schedule a call: https://lgarzalaw.com/schedule-online/
For business owners and families: At Garza Law, we are selective in choosing our clientele. We work with a select group of families every year to help them protect their legacy. If what you read here raised questions about your own situation, you can apply here: